[Cliogerbil1]

Hi

I'm new to the group. I am on my 2nd Q30. The first being a 2017 SE Business Executive and now a 2016/17 Sport with BOSE and panoramic roof.

I have done a video review of both cars on my youtube channel (and have some of my projects on there) Feel free to subscribe or have a watch/comment.

 

[Milda Hauss]

sdfsd

 

[Mike50]

Hi

I'm new to the group. I am on my 2nd Q30. The first being a 2017 SE Business Executive and now a 2016/17 Sport with BOSE and panoramic roof.

I have done a video review of both cars on my youtube channel (and have some of my projects on there) Feel free to subscribe or have a watch/comment.

Hi, just joined the forum as I'm looking at buying a 2017 1.5 Q30s, I test drove a 1.5 Q30 SE Business yesterday and was reasonably surprised and impressed. Surprised because its difficult to find good reviews for the Q30. Yes it lacked rear passenger space, but overall it was responsive and comfortable but being 6'1" I am concerned about left leg room for long journeys. Most reviews claim it doesn't get anything like the mpg Infinity state yet you clearly showed a good 70mpg. Having had 2 Q30's I assume you know all the pro's and cons, would you share you thoughts on the car please. Many thanks in anticipation.

 

[Cliogerbil1]

Hi. Definitely get the S if you can. Its such a better place to be than the other models....moat noticeably for seat comfort. Someone i know that was 6 foot 5 had one of these and had issues with getting comfortable but that was an SE. To be honest they aren't the roomiest of cabins. The engine is basically the same one as in the merc A class and Renault Clio. Ive always found it to be very good on fuel averaging around 70mpg all of the time...even constantly round town i still get over 55mpg. They are very cheap to run

 

[Cliogerbil1]

On the mpg side i think most review cars were the 2.2 diesel which are a very noisy engine and don't reach the mpg figures claimed. Hence why i went for the 1.5 again

 

[Mike50]

On the mpg side i think most review cars were the 2.2 diesel which are a very noisy engine and don't reach the mpg figures claimed. Hence why i went for the 1.5 again

Thanks for that.

 

[b1980mask]

On the mpg side i think most review cars were the 2.2 diesel which are a very noisy engine and don't reach the mpg figures claimed. Hence why i went for the 1.5 again

Thanks for this car tip!

 

[420chengandrew]

On the mpg side i think most review cars were the 2.2 diesel which are a very noisy engine and don't reach the mpg figures claimed. Hence why i went for the 1.5 again

Nice never heard about this and i'm planing to buy my first car will keep this in mind